I'm pretty sure there's a known issue with reference sequences that are
longer than INT_MAX_VALUE, so that is probably the problem you are seeing.
I agree that the logging could be better, but I doubt this will be fixed
soon.

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Travis Collier notifications@github.com
wrote:

I'm getting a exception being thrown by multiple tools which use htsjdk
(IGV, picard and samtools specifically). GATK is also choking on the bam
file, but it's errors don't get logged in my workflow as well.

Example: running IGV 2.3.63 on a bam file generated with bwa mem
0.7.5a-r405 from paired-end reads... when I zoom in far enough to show
alignments it throws:

Error encountered querying alignments: htsjdk.samtools.SAMException: Unexpected number of metadata chunks 4

Various recent versions of htslib seem to be involved.
java version "1.8.0_91"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_91-b14)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.91-b14, mixed mode)
OS: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS (with 128GB of RAM)

I'm thinking that the problem might have to do with the fact that one of
the scaffolds in my reference is 552137040 bp long. 8*552137040 > 2^32, but
I'm not sure why that would be an issue. Maybe something to do with
indexing, but I'm just guessing.

There is nothing obvious in logs. I'm currently working on chopping up
that big scaffold in the reference to see if the issues persist, but I
suspect they will. Essentially the same workflow has run fine with a
different reference.

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#643, or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/ACnk0kQKfLDgRDSZVGsOken3CqVbePrgks5qMxp2gaJpZM4I4xMg
.

I think I've found at least part of the problem actually...
According to the SAM reference docs:
https://samtools.github.io/hts-specs/SAMv1.pdf

In the BAI format, each bin may span 229, 226, 223, 220, 217 or 214 bp. Bin 0 spans a 512Mbp region, bins 1–8 span 64Mbp, 9–72 8Mbp, 73–584 1Mbp, 585–4680 128Kbp, and bins 4681–37448 span 16Kbp regions.
This implies that this index format does not support reference chromosome sequences longer than 2^29 − 1.
The CSI format generalises the sizes of the bins, and supports reference sequences of the same length as are supported by SAM and BAM.

Looks like I need to use CSI indexes.

Note that the limit isn't quite INT_MAX_VALUE, it is (2^29)-1

That was throwing me off since I'm well below (2^32)-1.
I was also a bit confused by "references" and "reference sequences"... I was thinking that was referring to the total length, not per contig. Obvious in retrospect of course. The SAM docs uses the term "reference chromosome sequences" which is unambiguous.

Clearly the error handling could be improved when attempting to view a reference/chromosome sequence over 512Mbp using the BAI index.

See also #447 for supporting CSI indexing, needed if you have a reference/chromosome longer than 512Mbp.

We should fix that error message so that it's not confusing and useless. I opened a more explicit ticket #823