-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
Is there a file size limitation? #315
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Can you provide the specific error via the debug flags:
as well as share the S3 implementation you use, e.g., Amazon, Ceph? Errors at the 5 GB boundary imply some misconfiguration around multi-part uploads. |
Hi Andrew, Thanks for your help! Could you please explain a bit more the step in order to retreive the log please?
s3fs $BUCKET $MOUNTPOINT -d -d -f -o f2 -o curldbg (I also need to add -o use_cache and -o allow_other) Regards. |
Yes please invoke s3fs with those options then reproduce the symptoms with your application. When you encounter the error, please attach the relevant symptoms here or in a gist. |
@Phantom-Studio https://github.com/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse/blob/master/src/fdcache.cpp#L1353 Please try to set multipart_size option. |
We kept this issue open for a long time. |
Hi ggtakec, below is how I mount my ceph s3: May I know if there is any configuration mistakes? I have no problem when file size is small, says 20GB. |
@alphainets I am seeing the same issue with a 100GB, and 432GB files. Did you resolve this issue? |
s3fs 1.87 and earlier require temporary space equal to the object size. Please test with the latest master which includes a large file optimization that reduces temporary space usage. If this symptom persists, please run with |
Hi all,
As suggested in the title, I wanted to know if there is a file size limitation?
Because on Github page of s3fs-fuse, I can read "Maximum file size=64GB (limited by s3fs, not Amazon)." But I suspect s3fs to fail when trying to upload file greater than 5Gb ; everytime I get a write error.
Thanks for your help.
Regards.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: