004-bean-util

004-bean-utl

Bean属性拷贝，主要针对几个常用的拷贝框架进行性能对比，以及功能扩展支持

选用的框架

cglib (直接使用Spring封装的BeanCopier)
apache
MapStruct
Spring
HuTool

I.背景

当业务量不大时，不管选择哪个框架都没什么问题，只要功能支持就ok了；但是当数据量大的时候，可能就需要考虑性能问题了；再实际的项目中，正好遇到了这个问题，不仅慢，还发现会有锁竞争，这特么就尼普了

项目中使用的是Spring的 BeanUtils，版本 3.2.4.RELEASE，版本相对较老，主要问题在于org.springframework.beans.CachedIntrospectionResults.forClass

/**
 * Create CachedIntrospectionResults for the given bean class.
 * <P>We don't want to use synchronization here. Object references are atomic,
 * so we can live with doing the occasional unnecessary lookup at startup only.
 * @param beanClass the bean class to analyze
 * @return the corresponding CachedIntrospectionResults
 * @throws BeansException in case of introspection failure
 */
static CachedIntrospectionResults forClass(Class beanClass) throws BeansException {
    CachedIntrospectionResults results;
    Object value;
    synchronized (classCache) {
        value = classCache.get(beanClass);
    }
    if (value instanceof Reference) {
        Reference ref = (Reference) value;
        results = (CachedIntrospectionResults) ref.get();
    }
    else {
        results = (CachedIntrospectionResults) value;
    }
    if (results == null) {
        if (ClassUtils.isCacheSafe(beanClass, CachedIntrospectionResults.class.getClassLoader()) ||
                isClassLoaderAccepted(beanClass.getClassLoader())) {
            results = new CachedIntrospectionResults(beanClass);
            synchronized (classCache) {
                classCache.put(beanClass, results);
            }
        }
        else {
            if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
                logger.debug("Not strongly caching class [" + beanClass.getName() + "] because it is not cache-safe");
            }
            results = new CachedIntrospectionResults(beanClass);
            synchronized (classCache) {
                classCache.put(beanClass, new WeakReference<CachedIntrospectionResults>(results));
            }
        }
    }
    return results;
}

看上面的实现，每次获取value都加了一个同步锁，而且还是锁的全局的classCache，这就有些过分了啊，微妙的是这段代码注释，谷歌翻译之后为

我们不想在这里使用同步。对象引用是原子的，因此我们可以只在启动时进行偶尔的不必要查找。

这意思大概是说我就在启动的时候用一下，并不会频繁的使用，所以使用了同步代码块也问题不大...

但是在BeanUtils#copyProperties中就蛋疼了，每次都会执行这个方法，扎心了

当然我们现在一般用的Spring5+了，这段代码也早就做了改造了，新版的如下，不再存在上面的这个并发问题了

/**
 * Create CachedIntrospectionResults for the given bean class.
 * @param beanClass the bean class to analyze
 * @return the corresponding CachedIntrospectionResults
 * @throws BeansException in case of introspection failure
 */
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
static CachedIntrospectionResults forClass(Class<?> beanClass) throws BeansException {
    CachedIntrospectionResults results = strongClassCache.get(beanClass);
    if (results != null) {
        return results;
    }
    results = softClassCache.get(beanClass);
    if (results != null) {
        return results;
    }

    results = new CachedIntrospectionResults(beanClass);
    ConcurrentMap<Class<?>, CachedIntrospectionResults> classCacheToUse;

    if (ClassUtils.isCacheSafe(beanClass, CachedIntrospectionResults.class.getClassLoader()) ||
            isClassLoaderAccepted(beanClass.getClassLoader())) {
        classCacheToUse = strongClassCache;
    }
    else {
        if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
            logger.debug("Not strongly caching class [" + beanClass.getName() + "] because it is not cache-safe");
        }
        classCacheToUse = softClassCache;
    }

    CachedIntrospectionResults existing = classCacheToUse.putIfAbsent(beanClass, results);
    return (existing != null ? existing : results);
}

II. 不同框架使用姿势

接下来我们看一下几种常见的bean拷贝框架的使用姿势，以及对比测试

1. apache BeanUtils

阿里规范中，明确说明了，不要使用它，idea安装阿里的代码规范插件之后，会有提示

使用姿势比较简单，引入依赖

<!-- https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/commons-beanutils/commons-beanutils -->
<dependency>
    <groupId>commons-beanutils</groupId>
    <artifactId>commons-beanutils</artifactId>
    <version>1.9.4</version>
</dependency>

属性拷贝

@Component
public class ApacheCopier {
    public <K, T> T copy(K source, Class<T> target) throws IllegalAccessException, InstantiationException, InvocationTargetException {
        T res = target.newInstance();
        // 注意，第一个参数为target，第二个参数为source
        // 与其他的正好相反 
        BeanUtils.copyProperties(res, source);
        return res;
    }
}

2. cglib BeanCopier

cglib是通过动态代理的方式来实现属性拷贝的，与上面基于反射实现方式存在本质上的区别，这也是它性能更优秀的主因

在Spring环境下，一般不需要额外的引入依赖；或者直接引入spring-core

<!--      cglib  -->
<dependency>
    <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
    <artifactId>spring-core</artifactId>
    <version>5.2.8.RELEASE</version>
    <scope>compile</scope>
</dependency>

属性拷贝

@Component
public class SpringCglibCopier {
    /**
     * cglib 对象转换
     *
     * @param source
     * @param target
     * @param <K>
     * @param <T>
     * @return
     * @throws IllegalAccessException
     * @throws InstantiationException
     */
    public <K, T> T copy(K source, Class<T> target) throws IllegalAccessException, InstantiationException {
        BeanCopier copier = BeanCopier.create(source.getClass(), target, false);
        T res = target.newInstance();
        copier.copy(source, res, null);
        return res;
    }
}

当然也可以直接使用纯净版的cglib，引入依赖

<dependency>
    <groupId>cglib</groupId>
    <artifactId>cglib</artifactId>
    <version>3.3.0</version>
</dependency>

使用姿势和上面一模一样

@Component
public class PureCglibCopier {
    /**
     * cglib 对象转换
     *
     * @param source
     * @param target
     * @param <K>
     * @param <T>
     * @return
     * @throws IllegalAccessException
     * @throws InstantiationException
     */
    public <K, T> T copy(K source, Class<T> target) throws IllegalAccessException, InstantiationException {
        BeanCopier copier = BeanCopier.create(source.getClass(), target, false);
        T res = target.newInstance();
        copier.copy(source, res, null);
        return res;
    }
}

3. spring BeanUtils

这里使用的是spring 5.2.1.RELEASE，就不要拿3.2来使用了，不然并发下的性能实在是感人

基于内省+反射，借助getter/setter方法实现属性拷贝，性能比apache高

核心依赖

<dependency>
    <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
    <artifactId>spring-beans</artifactId>
    <version>5.2.1.RELEASE</version>
    <scope>compile</scope>
</dependency>

属性拷贝

@Component
public class SpringBeanCopier {

    /**
     * 对象转换
     *
     * @param source
     * @param target
     * @param <K>
     * @param <T>
     * @return
     * @throws IllegalAccessException
     * @throws InstantiationException
     */
    public <K, T> T copy(K source, Class<T> target) throws IllegalAccessException, InstantiationException {
        T res = target.newInstance();
        BeanUtils.copyProperties(source, res);
        return res;
    }
}

4. hutool BeanUtil

hutool 提供了很多的java工具类，从测试效果来看它的性能比apache会高一点，当低于spring

引入依赖

<dependency>
    <groupId>cn.hutool</groupId>
    <artifactId>hutool-core</artifactId>
    <version>5.6.0</version>
</dependency>

使用姿势

@Component
public class HutoolCopier {

    /**
     * bean 对象转换
     *
     * @param source
     * @param target
     * @param <K>
     * @param <T>
     * @return
     */
    public <K, T> T copy(K source, Class<T> target) throws Exception {
        return BeanUtil.toBean(source, target);
    }
}

5. MapStruct

MapStruct 性能更强悍了，缺点也比较明显，需要声明bean的转换接口，自动代码生成的方式来实现拷贝，性能媲美直接的get/set

引入依赖

<dependency>
    <groupId>org.mapstruct</groupId>
    <artifactId>mapstruct</artifactId>
    <version>1.4.2.Final</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
    <groupId>org.mapstruct</groupId>
    <artifactId>mapstruct-processor</artifactId>
    <version>1.4.2.Final</version>
</dependency>

使用姿势

@Mapper
public interface MapStructCopier {
    Target copy(Source source);
}

@Component
public class MapsCopier {
    private MapStructCopier mapStructCopier = Mappers.getMapper(MapStructCopier.class);

    public Target copy(Source source, Class<Target> target) {
        return mapStructCopier.copy(source);
    }
}

缺点也比较明显，需要显示的接口转换声明

6. 测试

定义两个Bean，用于转换测试，两个bean的成员属性名，类型完全一致

@Data
public class Source {
    private Integer id;
    private String user_name;
    private Double price;
    private List<Long> ids;
    private BigDecimal marketPrice;
}

@Data
public class Target {
    private Integer id;
    private String user_name;
    private Double price;
    private List<Long> ids;
    private BigDecimal marketPrice;
}

6.1 功能测试

private Random random = new Random();

public Source genSource() {
    Source source = new Source();
    source.setId(random.nextInt());
    source.setIds(Arrays.asList(random.nextLong(), random.nextLong(), random.nextLong()));
    source.setMarketPrice(new BigDecimal(random.nextFloat()));
    source.setPrice(random.nextInt(120) / 10.0d);
    source.setUser_name("一灰灰Blog");
    return source;
}


 private void copyTest() throws Exception {
        Source s = genSource();
        Target ta = apacheCopier.copy(s, Target.class);
        Target ts = springBeanCopier.copy(s, Target.class);
        Target tc = springCglibCopier.copy(s, Target.class);
        Target tp = pureCglibCopier.copy(s, Target.class);
        Target th = hutoolCopier.copy(s, Target.class);
        Target tm = mapsCopier.copy(s, Target.class);
        System.out.println("source:\t" + s + "\napache:\t" + ta + "\nspring:\t" + ts
                + "\nsCglib:\t" + tc + "\npCglib:\t" + tp + "\nhuTool:\t" + th + "\nmapStruct:\t" + tm);
}

输出结果如下，满足预期

source:	Source(id=1337715455, user_name=一灰灰Blog, price=7.1, ids=[7283949433132389385, 3441022909341384204, 8273318310870260875], marketPrice=0.04279220104217529296875)
apache:	Target(id=1337715455, user_name=一灰灰Blog, price=7.1, ids=[7283949433132389385, 3441022909341384204, 8273318310870260875], marketPrice=0.04279220104217529296875)
spring:	Target(id=1337715455, user_name=一灰灰Blog, price=7.1, ids=[7283949433132389385, 3441022909341384204, 8273318310870260875], marketPrice=0.04279220104217529296875)
sCglib:	Target(id=1337715455, user_name=一灰灰Blog, price=7.1, ids=[7283949433132389385, 3441022909341384204, 8273318310870260875], marketPrice=0.04279220104217529296875)
pCglib:	Target(id=1337715455, user_name=一灰灰Blog, price=7.1, ids=[7283949433132389385, 3441022909341384204, 8273318310870260875], marketPrice=0.04279220104217529296875)
huTool:	Target(id=1337715455, user_name=一灰灰Blog, price=7.1, ids=[7283949433132389385, 3441022909341384204, 8273318310870260875], marketPrice=0.04279220104217529296875)
mapStruct:	Target(id=1337715455, user_name=一灰灰Blog, price=7.1, ids=[7283949433132389385, 3441022909341384204, 8273318310870260875], marketPrice=0.04279220104217529296875)

6.2 性能测试

接下来我们关注一下不同的工具包，实现属性拷贝的性能对比情况如何

public void test() throws Exception {
    // 第一次用于预热
    autoCheck(Target2.class, 10000);
    autoCheck(Target2.class, 10000);
    autoCheck(Target2.class, 10000_0);
    autoCheck(Target2.class, 50000_0);
    autoCheck(Target2.class, 10000_00);
}

private <T> void autoCheck(Class<T> target, int size) throws Exception {
    StopWatch stopWatch = new StopWatch();
    runCopier(stopWatch, "apacheCopier", size, (s) -> apacheCopier.copy(s, target));
    runCopier(stopWatch, "springCglibCopier", size, (s) -> springCglibCopier.copy(s, target));
    runCopier(stopWatch, "pureCglibCopier", size, (s) -> pureCglibCopier.copy(s, target));
    runCopier(stopWatch, "hutoolCopier", size, (s) -> hutoolCopier.copy(s, target));
    runCopier(stopWatch, "springBeanCopier", size, (s) -> springBeanCopier.copy(s, target));
    runCopier(stopWatch, "mapStruct", size, (s) -> mapsCopier.copy(s, target));
    System.out.println((size / 10000) + "w -------- cost: " + stopWatch.prettyPrint());
}

private <T> void runCopier(StopWatch stopWatch, String key, int size, CopierFunc func) throws Exception {
    stopWatch.start(key);
    for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
        Source s = genSource();
        func.apply(s);
    }
    stopWatch.stop();
}

@FunctionalInterface
public interface CopierFunc<T> {
    T apply(Source s) throws Exception;
}

输出结果如下

1w -------- cost: StopWatch '': running time = 583135900 ns
---------------------------------------------
ns         %     Task name
---------------------------------------------
488136600  084%  apacheCopier
009363500  002%  springCglibCopier
009385500  002%  pureCglibCopier
053982900  009%  hutoolCopier
016976500  003%  springBeanCopier
005290900  001%  mapStruct

10w -------- cost: StopWatch '': running time = 5607831900 ns
---------------------------------------------
ns         %     Task name
---------------------------------------------
4646282100  083%  apacheCopier
096047200  002%  springCglibCopier
093815600  002%  pureCglibCopier
548897800  010%  hutoolCopier
169937400  003%  springBeanCopier
052851800  001%  mapStruct

50w -------- cost: StopWatch '': running time = 27946743000 ns
---------------------------------------------
ns         %     Task name
---------------------------------------------
23115325200  083%  apacheCopier
481878600  002%  springCglibCopier
475181600  002%  pureCglibCopier
2750257900  010%  hutoolCopier
855448400  003%  springBeanCopier
268651300  001%  mapStruct

100w -------- cost: StopWatch '': running time = 57141483600 ns
---------------------------------------------
ns         %     Task name
---------------------------------------------
46865332600  082%  apacheCopier
1019163600  002%  springCglibCopier
1033701100  002%  pureCglibCopier
5897726100  010%  hutoolCopier
1706155900  003%  springBeanCopier
619404300  001%  mapStruct

-	1w	10w	50w	100w
apache	0.488136600s / 084%	4.646282100s / 083%	23.115325200s / 083%	46.865332600s / 083%
spring cglib	0.009363500s / 002%	0.096047200s / 002%	0.481878600s / 002%	1.019163600s / 002%
pure cglibg	0.009385500s / 002%	0.093815600s / 002%	0.475181600s / 002%	1.033701100s / 002%
hutool	0.053982900s / 009%	0.548897800s / 010%	2.750257900s / 010%	5.897726100s / 010%
spring	0.016976500s / 003%	0.169937400s / 003%	0.855448400s / 003%	1.706155900s / 003%
mapstruct	0.005290900s / 001%	0.052851800s / 001%	0.268651300s / 001%	0.619404300s / 001%
total	0.583135900s	5.607831900s	27.946743000s	57.141483600s

上面的测试中，存在一个不同的变量，即不是用相同的source对象来测试不同的工具转换情况，但是这个不同并不会太影响不同框架的性能对比，基本上从上面的运行结果来看

mapstruct, cglib, spring 表现最好
apache 表现最差

基本趋势相当于:

apache -> 10 * hutool -> 28 * spring -> 45 * cglib -> 83 * mapstruct

如果我们需要实现简单的bean拷贝，选择cglib或者spring的是个不错选择

III. 驼峰下划线拷贝支持

上面的使用都是最基本的使用姿势，属性名 + 类型一致，都有getter/setter方法，我们实际的业务场景中，有一个比较重要的地方，就是下划线与驼峰的转换支持，如果要使用上面的框架，可以怎样适配?

1. cglib 下划线转驼峰

spring cglib封装与纯净版的cglib 实现逻辑差别不大，主要是spring里面做了一些缓存，所以表现会相对好一点；为了更加通用，这里以纯净版的cglib进行扩展演示

cglib实现转换的核心逻辑在 net.sf.cglib.beans.BeanCopier.Generator.generateClass

public void generateClass(ClassVisitor v) {
    // ... 省略无关代码
    PropertyDescriptor[] getters = ReflectUtils.getBeanGetters(source);
    PropertyDescriptor[] setters = ReflectUtils.getBeanSetters(target);
    
    // 扫描source的所有getter方法，写入到map， key为属性名; 
    // 为了支持驼峰，下划线，我们可以扩展一下这个map，如果属性名为下划线的，额外加一个驼峰的kv进去 
    Map names = new HashMap();
    for (int i = 0; i < getters.length; i++) {
        names.put(getters[i].getName(), getters[i]);
    }
   
    // ...

    for (int i = 0; i < setters.length; i++) {
        PropertyDescriptor setter = setters[i];
        // 这里根据target的属性名，获取source对应的getter方法，同样适配一下，如果下划线格式的获取不到，则改用驼峰的试一下
        PropertyDescriptor getter = (PropertyDescriptor)names.get(setter.getName());
        if (getter != null) {
           // ....
        }
    }
   // ...
}

改造逻辑，上面的注释中已经贴出来了，核心实现就比较简单了

提供一个下划线转驼峰的工具了 StrUtil

public class StrUtil {
    private static final char UNDER_LINE = '_';

    /**
     * 下划线转驼峰
     *
     * @param name
     * @return
     */
    public static String toCamelCase(String name) {
        if (null == name || name.length() == 0) {
            return null;
        }

        if (!contains(name, UNDER_LINE)) {
            return name;
        }

        int length = name.length();
        StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(length);
        boolean underLineNextChar = false;

        for (int i = 0; i < length; ++i) {
            char c = name.charAt(i);
            if (c == UNDER_LINE) {
                underLineNextChar = true;
            } else if (underLineNextChar) {
                sb.append(Character.toUpperCase(c));
                underLineNextChar = false;
            } else {
                sb.append(c);
            }
        }

        return sb.toString();
    }

    public static boolean contains(String str, char searchChar) {
        return str.indexOf(searchChar) >= 0;
    }
}

然后自定义一个 PureCglibBeanCopier, 将之前BeanCopier的代码都拷贝进来，然后改一下上面注释的两个地方 (完整的代码参考项目源码)

public void generateClass(ClassVisitor v) {
    // ... 省略无关代码
    PropertyDescriptor[] setters = ReflectUtils.getBeanSetters(target);
    
    // 扫描source的所有getter方法，写入到map， key为属性名; 
    // 为了支持驼峰，下划线，我们可以扩展一下这个map，如果属性名为下划线的，额外加一个驼峰的kv进去 
    Map<String, PropertyDescriptor> names = buildGetterNameMapper(source)
   
    // ...

    for (int i = 0; i < setters.length; i++) {
        PropertyDescriptor setter = setters[i];
        // 这里根据target的属性名，获取source对应的getter方法，同样适配一下，如果下划线格式的获取不到，则改用驼峰的试一下
        PropertyDescriptor getter = loadSourceGetter(names, setter);
        if (getter != null) {
           // ....
        }
    }
   // ...
}


/**
 * 获取目标的getter方法，支持下划线与驼峰
 *
 * @param source
 * @return
 */
public Map<String, PropertyDescriptor> buildGetterNameMapper(Class source) {
    PropertyDescriptor[] getters = org.springframework.cglib.core.ReflectUtils.getBeanGetters(source);
    Map<String, PropertyDescriptor> names = new HashMap<>(getters.length);
    for (int i = 0; i < getters.length; ++i) {
        String name = getters[i].getName();
        String camelName = StrUtil.toCamelCase(name);
        names.put(name, getters[i]);
        if (!name.equalsIgnoreCase(camelName)) {
            // 支持下划线转驼峰
            names.put(camelName, getters[i]);
        }
    }
    return names;
}

/**
 * 根据target的setter方法，找到source的getter方法，支持下划线与驼峰的转换
 *
 * @param names
 * @param setter
 * @return
 */
public PropertyDescriptor loadSourceGetter(Map<String, PropertyDescriptor> names, PropertyDescriptor setter) {
    String setterName = setter.getName();
    return names.getOrDefault(setterName, names.get(StrUtil.toCamelCase(setterName)));
}

使用姿势和之前没有什么区别，就是BeanCopier的创建这里稍稍修改一下即可（BeanCopier可以加缓存，避免频繁的创建）

public <K, T> T copyAndParse(K source, Class<T> target) throws IllegalAccessException, InstantiationException {
    // todo copier 可以缓存起来，避免每次重新创建
    BeanCopier copier = PureCglibBeanCopier.create(source.getClass(), target, false);
    T res = target.newInstance();
    copier.copy(source, res, null);
    return res;
}

2. hutool 下划线转驼峰

hutool也支持下划线与驼峰的互转，而且不需要修改源码，只用我们自己维护一个FieldMapper即可，改动成本较小；而且在map2bean, bean2map时，可以无修改的实现驼峰下划线互转，这一点还是非常很优秀的

/**
 * 驼峰转换
 *
 * @param source
 * @param target
 * @param <K>
 * @param <T>
 * @return
 */
public <K, T> T copyAndParse(K source, Class<T> target) throws Exception {
    T res = target.newInstance();
    // 下划线转驼峰
    BeanUtil.copyProperties(source, res, getCopyOptions(source.getClass()));
    return res;
}

// 缓存CopyOptions（注意这个是HuTool的类，不是Cglib的）

private Map<Class, CopyOptions> cacheMap = new HashMap<>();


private CopyOptions getCopyOptions(Class source) {
    CopyOptions options = cacheMap.get(source);
    if (options == null) {
        // 不加锁，我们认为重复执行不会比并发加锁带来的开销大
        options = CopyOptions.create().setFieldMapping(buildFieldMapper(source));
        cacheMap.put(source, options);
    }
    return options;
}

/**
 * @param source
 * @return
 */
private Map<String, String> buildFieldMapper(Class source) {
    PropertyDescriptor[] properties = ReflectUtils.getBeanProperties(source);
    Map<String, String> map = new HashMap<>();
    for (PropertyDescriptor target : properties) {
        String name = target.getName();
        String camel = StrUtil.toCamelCase(name);
        if (!name.equalsIgnoreCase(camel)) {
            map.put(name, camel);
        }
        String under = StrUtil.toUnderlineCase(name);
        if (!name.equalsIgnoreCase(under)) {
            map.put(name, under);
        }
    }
    return map;
}

3. mapstruct

最后再介绍一下MapStruct，虽然我们需要手动编码来实现转换，但是好处是性能高啊，既然已经手动编码了，那也就不介意补上下划线和驼峰的转换了

@Mappings({
        @Mapping(target = "userName", source = "user_name"),
        @Mapping(target = "market_price", source = "marketPrice")
})
Target2 copyAndParse(Source source);

4. 测试

接下来测试一下上面三个是否能正常工作

定义一个Target2，注意它与Source有两个字段不同，分别是 user_name/userName, marketPrice/market_price

@Data
public class Target2 {
    private Integer id;
    private String userName;
    private Double price;
    private List<Long> ids;
    private BigDecimal market_price;
}

private void camelParse() throws Exception {
    Source s = genSource();
    Target2 cglib = springCglibCopier.copyAndParse(s, Target2.class);
    Target2 cglib2 = pureCglibCopier.copyAndParse(s, Target2.class);
    Target2 hutool = hutoolCopier.copyAndParse(s, Target2.class);
    Target2 map = mapsCopier.copy(s, Target2.class);
    System.out.println("source:" + s + "\nsCglib:" + cglib + "\npCglib:" + cglib2 + "\nhuTool:" + hutool + "\nMapStruct:" + map);
}

输出结果如下

source:Source(id=527180337, user_name=一灰灰Blog, price=7.9, ids=[-2509965589596742300, 5995028777901062972, -1914496225005416077], marketPrice=0.35188996791839599609375)
sCglib:Target2(id=527180337, userName=一灰灰Blog, price=7.9, ids=[-2509965589596742300, 5995028777901062972, -1914496225005416077], market_price=0.35188996791839599609375)
pCglib:Target2(id=527180337, userName=一灰灰Blog, price=7.9, ids=[-2509965589596742300, 5995028777901062972, -1914496225005416077], market_price=0.35188996791839599609375)
huTool:Target2(id=527180337, userName=一灰灰Blog, price=7.9, ids=[-2509965589596742300, 5995028777901062972, -1914496225005416077], market_price=0.35188996791839599609375)
MapStruct:Target2(id=527180337, userName=一灰灰Blog, price=7.9, ids=[-2509965589596742300, 5995028777901062972, -1914496225005416077], market_price=0.35188996791839599609375)

性能测试

private <T> void autoCheck2(Class<T> target, int size) throws Exception {
    StopWatch stopWatch = new StopWatch();
    runCopier(stopWatch, "apacheCopier", size, (s) -> apacheCopier.copy(s, target));
    runCopier(stopWatch, "springCglibCopier", size, (s) -> springCglibCopier.copyAndParse(s, target));
    runCopier(stopWatch, "pureCglibCopier", size, (s) -> pureCglibCopier.copyAndParse(s, target));
    runCopier(stopWatch, "hutoolCopier", size, (s) -> hutoolCopier.copyAndParse(s, target));
    runCopier(stopWatch, "springBeanCopier", size, (s) -> springBeanCopier.copy(s, target));
    runCopier(stopWatch, "mapStruct", size, (s) -> mapsCopier.copyAndParse(s,  target));
    System.out.println((size / 10000) + "w -------- cost: " + stopWatch.prettyPrint());
}

对比结果如下，虽然cglib, hutool 支持了驼峰,下划线的互转，最终的表现和上面的也没什么太大区别

1w -------- cost: StopWatch '': running time = 754589100 ns
---------------------------------------------
ns         %     Task name
---------------------------------------------
572878100  076%  apacheCopier yihui

017037900  002%  springCglibCopier
031207500  004%  pureCglibCopier
105254600  014%  hutoolCopier
022156300  003%  springBeanCopier
006054700  001%  mapStruct

1w -------- cost: StopWatch '': running time = 601845500 ns
---------------------------------------------
ns         %     Task name
---------------------------------------------
494895600  082%  apacheCopier
009014500  001%  springCglibCopier
008998600  001%  pureCglibCopier
067145800  011%  hutoolCopier
016557700  003%  springBeanCopier
005233300  001%  mapStruct

10w -------- cost: StopWatch '': running time = 5543094200 ns
---------------------------------------------
ns         %     Task name
---------------------------------------------
4474871900  081%  apacheCopier
089066500  002%  springCglibCopier
090526400  002%  pureCglibCopier
667986400  012%  hutoolCopier
166274800  003%  springBeanCopier
054368200  001%  mapStruct

50w -------- cost: StopWatch '': running time = 27527708400 ns
---------------------------------------------
ns         %     Task name
---------------------------------------------
22145604900  080%  apacheCopier
452946700  002%  springCglibCopier
448455700  002%  pureCglibCopier
3365908800  012%  hutoolCopier
843306700  003%  springBeanCopier
271485600  001%  mapStruct

Name	Name	Last commit message	Last commit date
parent directory ..
src/main/java/com/git/hui/boot/beanutil	src/main/java/com/git/hui/boot/beanutil	fix author	Jun 28, 2021
README.md	README.md	bean util	Apr 8, 2021
pom.xml	pom.xml	补æ添加 orika bean拷贝示例	Apr 20, 2021

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

Files

004-bean-util

004-bean-util

README.md

004-bean-utl

I.背景

II. 不同框架使用姿势

1. apache BeanUtils

2. cglib BeanCopier

3. spring BeanUtils

4. hutool BeanUtil

5. MapStruct

6. 测试

6.1 功能测试

6.2 性能测试

III. 驼峰下划线拷贝支持

1. cglib 下划线转驼峰

2. hutool 下划线转驼峰

3. mapstruct

4. 测试

Collapse file tree

Files

004-bean-util

Directory actions

More options

Directory actions

More options

Latest commit

History

004-bean-util

Folders and files

parent directory

README.md

004-bean-utl

I.背景

II. 不同框架使用姿势

1. apache BeanUtils

2. cglib BeanCopier

3. spring BeanUtils

4. hutool BeanUtil

5. MapStruct

6. 测试

6.1 功能测试

6.2 性能测试

III. 驼峰下划线拷贝支持

1. cglib 下划线转驼峰

2. hutool 下划线转驼峰

3. mapstruct

4. 测试