Closed
Description
Feature Description
- One-line feature description (can be used as a release note): kubectl get should get columns back from the server, not the client, to allow extensions to work cleanly
- Primary contact (assignee): smarterclayton
- Responsible SIGs: sig-cli, sig-api-machinery
- Design proposal link (community repo): https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/design-proposals/api-machinery/server-get.md
- KEP: https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/blob/master/keps/sig-api-machinery/20190322-server-side-get-to-ga.md
- Reviewer(s) - (for LGTM) recommend having 2+ reviewers (at least one from code-area OWNERS file) agreed to review. Reviewers from multiple companies preferred: pwittrock soltysh
- Approver (likely from SIG/area to which feature belongs): pwittrock soltysh
- Feature target (which target equals to which milestone):
- Alpha release target (x.y): 1.8 (server API)
- Beta release target (x.y): 1.10 (client get, server API)
- Stable release target (x.y): 1.15 (client get, server API)
As part of the split of kubectl from close coupling with the repository, and to allow better extensibility, it should be possible for third party API extensions and CRD to provide custom output for kubectl get
to avoid kubectl
having to have code to interpret those resources. We will move the printing to the server side, and kubectl will retrieve results. We also wish to move describe in a future release.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature.Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery.Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG CLI.Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Stable/GA status
Type
Projects
Milestone
Relationships
Development
No branches or pull requests
Activity
smarterclayton commentedon Nov 21, 2017
Client side and beta API targeted for 1.10
idvoretskyi commentedon Jan 15, 2018
@smarterclayton @kubernetes/sig-cli-feature-requests @kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-feature-requests still on track for 1.10?
smarterclayton commentedon Jan 15, 2018
We're trying to close the loop on the 1.10 plan
idvoretskyi commentedon Jan 22, 2018
@smarterclayton any progress?
smarterclayton commentedon Jan 22, 2018
Yes, we are planning to bring this to beta in 1.10. Work is being tracked in kubernetes/kubernetes#58536
79 remaining items