-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8k
introduce new feature flag for auto_sni #38604
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
+16
−13
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
aa85f66
to
33b4692
Compare
A later discussion concluded that it makes better sense to introduce a new feature flag for enabling auto_sni, and auto_san_validation should be clubbed with VERIFY_CERT_AT_CLIENT. RFC has been updated accordingly. Signed-off-by: Faseela K <faseela.k@est.tech>
33b4692
to
274c406
Compare
howardjohn
approved these changes
Apr 26, 2022
hzxuzhonghu
approved these changes
Apr 27, 2022
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
/retest |
/test integ-pilot-istiodremote-mc_istio |
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created: #38611 |
9 tasks
l8huang
pushed a commit
to l8huang/istio
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 16, 2022
* Add auto-sni support (istio#38238) * [WIP] Add auto-sni support Signed-off-by: Faseela K <faseela.k@est.tech> * Fix unit test failure Signed-off-by: Faseela K <faseela.k@est.tech> * enhance release-notes and small code improvements Signed-off-by: Faseela K <faseela.k@est.tech> * introduce new feature flag for auto_sni (istio#38604) A later discussion concluded that it makes better sense to introduce a new feature flag for enabling auto_sni, and auto_san_validation should be clubbed with VERIFY_CERT_AT_CLIENT. RFC has been updated accordingly. Signed-off-by: Faseela K <faseela.k@est.tech> * fix unit test Co-authored-by: Faseela K <faseela.k@est.tech>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
area/networking
release-notes-none
Indicates a PR that does not require release notes.
size/S
Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A later discussion concluded that it makes better sense
to introduce a new feature flag for enabling auto_sni,
and only auto_san_validation should be clubbed with existing VERIFY_CERT_AT_CLIENT feature flag.
RFC has been updated accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Faseela K faseela.k@est.tech
Please provide a description of this PR:
To help us figure out who should review this PR, please put an X in all the areas that this PR affects.
Please check any characteristics that apply to this pull request.