Skip to content

[Umbrella] Releasing Suspense #13206

New issue
New issue
Open
Open
[Umbrella] Releasing Suspense#13206
Labels
React Core TeamOpened by a member of the React Core TeamType: Umbrella
@acdlite

Description

@acdlite
acdlite
opened on Jul 13, 2018 · edited by gaearon

Let's use this issue to track the remaining tasks for releasing Suspense to open source.

Last updated: March 24, 2022

Blog post: The Plan for React 18

Completed: React 16

  • Release <Suspense> with React.lazy for client-side lazy loading

Completed: React 18 Alpha

  • Implement concurrent rendering, which is a prerequisite to everything else.
    Fix fundamental flaws in the concurrency model that made the behavior difficult to understand and caused many bugs.
    Rewrite how React traverses the tree to unblock fixing Suspense quirks.
    Redesign how React integrates with the scheduler to simplify the model, fix bugs, and prepare for native browser scheduling.
    Fix <Suspense> quirks: Previously, effects would fire inside a suspended tree too early. For example, you would see an effect from a component that's still hidden behind a placeholder. Now effects will run only after the content has been revealed. We expect this to fix existing application code bugs.
    Hiding and showing existing content should re-fire layout effects: If a component that's already visible suspends, we show a placeholder, and later show it again. However, there was no way for the component to know that it was hidden or shown. For example, a tooltip component measuring its screen position would get incorrect measurements while it's hidden. Now we fire useLayoutEffect cleanup (same as componentWillUnmount) on "hide", and useLayoutEffect setup (same as componentDidMount) on "show". We expect this to fix existing application and library code bugs.
    <Suspense> on the server no longer throws: It used to be a hard error to render <Suspense> in a tree on the server. Now, for the old server renderer, it silently emits the fallback (and lets the client try to render the content instead). This shouldn't affect existing apps because previously it was not possible to render <Suspense> on the server at all.
    startTransition lets you avoid hiding existing content even if it suspends again. This is useful to implement the "show old data while refetching" pattern with minimal code.
    Built-in throttling of Suspense reveals: To avoid updating the screen too often and causing visual jank, React "waits" a little bit before revealing the next level of spinners — in case even more content is available by that time. In other words, revealing nested Suspense fallbacks is automatically throttled by React.
  • New Streaming Suspense Server Renderer:
    • Initial streaming renderer implementation.
    • React.lazy works with SSR out of the box.
    • Streaming HTML: React uses your <Suspense> boundaries to stream the page HTML in visual chunks.
    • Selective Hydration: React uses your <Suspense> boundaries to hydrate the page in chunks, improving responsiveness.
      • React prioritizes hydrating the part of the page you are interacting with.
      • React keeps the browser responsive during hydration of <Suspense> boundaries.
      • React captures and replays missed events after hydration.
  • Technical preview of Server Components:
    • Implement the server with support for suspending.
    • Prototype a caching layer.
    • Prototype React I/O libraries like react-fetch and react-pg.
    • Support lazy-loaded elements for server trees.

Completed: React 18

  • Finalize New Streaming Suspense Server Renderer:
    • Make it pass all of our existing tests.
    • Prove it out in production (currently we use a hack in its place).
    • Add the missing "static markup" APIs for things like emails.
    • Fix known bugs with hydrating Suspense.
    • Move the new server renderer from react-dom/unstable-fizz to react-dom/server.
    • Fall back to client rendering from closest <Suspense> on mismatches instead of patching up the tree.
    Add onRecoverableError to gather production reports about SSR mismatches.

Features that may or may not appear in 18.x

  • <SuspenseList> lets you declaratively coordinate the order in which <Suspense> nodes inside will reveal.
    • Implementation.
    • Server support
    • Finalize and document the API.
  • "Backup" <Suspense> boundaries (not final naming): A way to specify that you'd like React to ignore this boundary during initial render (as if it's not there), unless React is forced to hide existing content. We sometimes call these "ugly spinners" or "last resort spinners". This use case might seem a bit exotic but we've needed it quite a few times.
    • Initial implementation as unstable_avoidThisFallback
    • Server support
    • Pick a good name
  • <Suspense> for CPU-bound trees (not final naming): A way to tell React to immediately show a placeholder without even trying to render the content. This is useful if you have an expensive tree inside. This use case is unrelated to network — it's about showing a spinner for some tree that takes a while to render. See Suspense for CPU-bound trees #19936.
    • Initial implementation as unstable_expectedLoadTime
    • Adjust the heuristics
    • Server support
    • Pick a good name
  • An API to prioritize hydrating a particular DOM element's parent tree.
    • Implement as ReactDOM. unstable_scheduleHydration
    • Pick a name
    • Reducing jank: Take another look at adjusting the small details to reduce any visual jank to the minimum. For example, throttle reveal of Suspense boundaries between siblings as well.

React 18.x (post-18.0): Suspense for Data Fetching

All of the above changes are foundational architectural improvements to <Suspense>. They fill the gaps in the mechanism and make it deeply integrated with all parts of React (client and server). However, they don't prescribe a particular data fetching strategy. That will likely come after the 18.0 release, and we're hoping that to have something during the next 18.x minor releases.

This work will include:

  • React I/O libraries like react-fetch, which is a lightweight and easiest way to fetch data with Suspense.
    • Initial implementation
    • Finalize the API
  • Built-in Suspense <Cache> which will likely be the primary recommended way for third-party data fetching libraries to integrate with Suspense. (For example, react-fetch uses it internally.)
    • Initial implementation
    • Try it in production
    • Investigate what's missing
    • Figure out the recommended strategy for normalized caches
  • Server Components, which will be the recommended way to fetch data with Suspense in a way that scales great and integrates with React Fetch as well as third-party libraries.
    • Initial implementation
    • Basic Server Context implementation
    • Server Context features for refetching
    • Figure out the layering between Server Components and New SSR
    • (This section has many follow-up questions, so it's incomplete)
    • Clear documentation and recommendations for data fetching library authors on how to integrate with Suspense

Activity

aweary

aweary commented on Jul 13, 2018

@aweary
aweary
on Jul 13, 2018
Contributor

Expose unstable_AsyncMode (maybe?)

Isn't this already exposed?

acdlite

acdlite commented on Jul 13, 2018

@acdlite
acdlite
on Jul 13, 2018
CollaboratorAuthor

I meant remove the unstable_

thoamsy

thoamsy commented on Jul 15, 2018

@thoamsy
thoamsy
on Jul 15, 2018

I am looking forward to open source of the unnamed code-splitting library 💯

ryota-murakami

ryota-murakami commented on Jul 23, 2018

@ryota-murakami
ryota-murakami
on Jul 23, 2018
Contributor

What does it mean [Umbrella]?🤔☂️

ghoullier

ghoullier commented on Jul 23, 2018

@ghoullier
ghoullier
on Jul 23, 2018 · edited by ghoullier

This mean, it's a feature which impact several projects/packages/tools.

ryota-murakami

ryota-murakami commented on Jul 23, 2018

@ryota-murakami
ryota-murakami
on Jul 23, 2018
Contributor

@ghoullier I see, Thank you so much!

JedWatson

JedWatson commented on Jul 24, 2018

@JedWatson
JedWatson
on Jul 24, 2018
Contributor

Hey @acdlite, just a question about how to best prepare for this. Not asking for / expecting any kind of timeline, but wondering:

Are you currently expecting these features to drop into React 16 and be easy to adopt incrementally, like the new Context API that landed with 16.3?

Or are you thinking it'll be something that pushes React to v17 and require more work to adopt?

Asking because I'm working on a roadmap that crosses over significantly with pretty much everything on your list and am trying to work out how to best deal with that.

Also do you have any tips on how to best prepare (in terms of code written today, that wants to be future compatible with these improvements to React) - polyfills / techniques / etc?

(apologies if these questions are answered elsewhere and I've missed them)

donaldpipowitch

donaldpipowitch commented on Jul 24, 2018

@donaldpipowitch
donaldpipowitch
on Jul 24, 2018

Adding another question to @JedWatson's questions:

  • We also don't need/expect to get a timeline for a stable release, but would it be possible/useful to get a new prerelease? (AFAIK the newest release is 16.4.0-alpha.0911da3 from February.)

Thank you! ❤️

NE-SmallTown

NE-SmallTown commented on Jul 24, 2018

@NE-SmallTown
NE-SmallTown
on Jul 24, 2018 · edited by NE-SmallTown
Contributor

IMO, they will provide a blog post like before before it's been landed.

And I think you don't need to prepare too much because there is no breaking change(it does have many features that maybe would seems different/conflict with current practices, like redux fetch with suspense, but there will be a codemod or easy encapsulation to do this, you know, fb has 3W+ components). And if you watch the talk of @acdlite (about ssr suspense in ZEIT) and @gaearon (about client suspense in iceland), you will know you don't need to worry about too much and it's not invasive.

By the way, you can just search the key 'Umbrella' in the repo and you will find more info like #8830 and #12152

AFAIK the newest release is 16.4.0-alpha.0911da3 from February.

IIRC, this is a misoperation?

sebinsua

sebinsua commented on Jul 24, 2018

@sebinsua
sebinsua
on Jul 24, 2018

@JedWatson This comment helped me understand what a developer must do to help ensure that their application's are async safe.

cyan33

cyan33 commented on Jul 24, 2018

@cyan33
cyan33
on Jul 24, 2018 · edited by cyan33
Contributor

I'm working on rolling out the suspense module and new APIs in facebook. In case @acdlite is busy with something else, I'd like to share some of my thoughts of our experience in facebook and answer some questions of @JedWatson.

Are you currently expecting these features to drop into React 16 and be easy to adopt incrementally, like the new Context API that landed with 16.3?

I'm not sure if it will come with React 16 or 17. According to the React team, it's likely to be released before the end of this year, which depends on how well it runs in facebook and how the related API is ready or not. But code-wise, I'm happy to say that it would be easy to adopt, because we've been experimenting for quite a while in facebook. The suspense feature will still work for the existing codebase. But with additional changes (like async rendering), you'll have more bonus that the new feature will bring you.

Do you have any tips on how to best prepare (in terms of code written today, that wants to be future compatible with these improvements to React) - polyfills / techniques / etc?

I'd say the migration is rather incremental and progressive. Like @NE-SmallTown said, we don't want to introduce any breaking changes. That would also be painful to roll out to facebook because we have a so large codebase. But so far, the roll out has been smooth and doesn't require you to do additional changes.

acdlite

acdlite commented on Jul 24, 2018

@acdlite
acdlite
on Jul 24, 2018 · edited by acdlite
CollaboratorAuthor

@JedWatson

Are you currently expecting these features to drop into React 16 and be easy to adopt incrementally, like the new Context API that landed with 16.3?

Incrementally. Always incrementally :) Otherwise there's no way we'd be able to ship this at Facebook.

Here's what I'm expecting:

Client Server-side rendering
Suspense Works everywhere* Same constraints as existing server renderer
Async rendering Opt-in using <AsyncMode> Same constraints as existing server renderer

*In sync mode, delayMs is always 0. Placeholders show up immediately.

Suspense will work without any changes to your existing components. At one point we thought we might require <StrictMode> compatibility, but during our internal testing we discovered one of the best ways to upgrade to strict mode was to use Suspense. Chicken-egg dilemma. So we found a way to make it work even outside of strict mode.

So the idea is that users will start migrating to Suspense even before they're ready to migrate to asynchronous rendering. Then once a subtree is ready, they can opt-in by wrapping in <AsyncMode>.

For new apps, though, the story is different: go async by default. We'll introduce a new root API (a replacement for ReactDOM.render) that is async only.

There will be an awkward period after the initial release where many third-party frameworks (Redux, Apollo, React Router...) may not work properly in async mode. That might hurt adoption for a while. But the idea is that the new features will be so compelling that it won't take long for libraries to either adapt or be superseded by an async-compatible alternative.

Also do you have any tips on how to best prepare (in terms of code written today, that wants to be future compatible with these improvements to React) - polyfills / techniques / etc?

Wrap everything in <StrictMode> and make sure there are no warnings. We'll have more detailed migration guides as we get closer to release.

hwillson

hwillson commented on Jul 25, 2018

@hwillson
hwillson
on Jul 25, 2018

There will be an awkward period after the initial release where many third-party frameworks (Redux, Apollo, React Router...) may not work properly in async mode.

Apollo doesn't do awkward - we'll be ready! 🕺😳

Seriously though, we ❤️ all things React, so making sure we're in-line with these changes for the initial release is not only a high priority, but it's also something we're super excited about! Thanks for all of your amazing work on this @acdlite!

markerikson

markerikson commented on Jul 25, 2018

@markerikson
markerikson
on Jul 25, 2018 · edited by markerikson
Contributor

I'll chime in and say that the Redux team is working on async compat for React-Redux.

I laid out a potential roadmap at reduxjs/react-redux#950 . TL;DR:

  • React-Redux 5.1 will hopefully work with <StrictMode> with no warnings (current PR: Fix getDerivedStateFromProps usage reduxjs/react-redux#980 )
  • 6.0 will be an internal rewrite to use the new context API, add ref forwarding, and possibly other changes, but try to keep as much of the current public API as possible (ie, <Provider> and connect() ). We'll see how well that works with async rendering, and figure out the best path forward. (My prior proof-of-concept PR is at React 16 experiment: rewrite React-Redux to use new context API reduxjs/react-redux#898 , but we'll probably redo it based on other lessons learned from the 5.1 work.) It's likely that this release would require React 16.5 as a minimum, due to the need for new context and probably also the as-yet unreleased "read context from lifecycle methods" PR that was just merged.
  • After that, we're open to ideas for a different React-Redux API (yes, yes, that possibly includes render props, people).

We'd appreciate more eyes on our WIP, and hopefully people can give us some more feedback and discussion on how they're looking at using Redux with React Suspense and async rendering so we can make sure use cases get covered properly. We're also hoping to have some more discussions with the React team about exactly what constraints we need to work with, and it'd be helpful if we could get some sample apps that would let us see what problems we need to solve for all this to work correctly.

anymost

anymost commented on Jul 26, 2018

@anymost
anymost
on Jul 26, 2018

looking forward to the release of Async rendering and Suspense

137 remaining items

Loading
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    React Core TeamOpened by a member of the React Core TeamType: Umbrella

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

        Participants

        @bvaughn@Jessidhia@dfabulich@Alxandr@hwillson

        Issue actions

          [Umbrella] Releasing Suspense · Issue #13206 · facebook/react