-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26.2k
fix(common): add @Injectable()
to common pipes
#29834
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM (provided that we actually want to inject all the pipes...)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@ocombe Can you change the commit message to |
7242193
to
8a109f4
Compare
@Injectable()
to common pipes@Injectable()
to common pipes
Sorry to interfere here, but if this is required with Ivy, isn't that a breaking change (in Ivy) to the current engine where these decorators where explicitly not required (having |
I think that it's only an issue if you use |
OK, that would make sense. To elaborate, I got here from reading the CHANGELOG which reads a bit unfortunate if this is the case. :-) |
This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity. Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy. This action has been performed automatically by a bot. |
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Common pipes don't have the
@Injectable
decorator.Issue Number: FW-1242
What is the new behavior?
Common pipes have the
@Injectable
decorator which makes them injectable for ivy.Does this PR introduce a breaking change?